Thursday, February 19, 2009

Bang!

(This article originally appeared on One Flew Over the Church)

I remember growing up and hearing about the "Big Bang" theory pertaining to the origin of the Universe. I heard about this from several sources - school, books, television and I even recall a magazine cover (I think it was Time) that highlighted the theory. Being a modern evangelical Christian, I dismissed the theory, cramming only the information needed to record a satisfactory grade on a science test and then discarded the info in favor of my personal "Young Earth" theory based on the 6000 years that modern Bible-Belt evangelicals espouse. I continued to wonder what sort of godless heathen could possibly have come up with such heresy.

A few years ago, I had pretty much discarded my 6000 year theory and left my mind open to many theories that account for God's creation being a little more complex than we were giving such an event credit for. I suspected that theories I had heard about God creating the Universe at the speed of light as well as other anomalies could very well account for several million (if not billion) years that could have predated Biblical genealogies.

It wasn't until a few months ago that I happened upon an episode of "The Universe" on the History Channel that was covering the formation of the theory. Imagine my surprise to hear that instead of a godless heathen, the Big Bang was the brainchild of a professor and Catholic priest by the name of Georges LeMaitre. I sat in amazement - even took notes like a diligent college student - as the evidence was presented as it had been compiled.

LeMaitre proposed his theory of an expanding Universe in 1927. Edwin Hubble discovered that the galaxies are flying out from the center of the Universe at an incredible speed in 1929. And then, in 1965 Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson used the Holmdel antenna to discover that the Universe actually has a "sound" (caused by cosmic radiation) - that resembles static on a radio when captured by radio telescope - that is theoretically the echo of the great explosion from all those eons ago.

Now, I know that there are many people who want to dismiss this whole article (and more specifically me) as heresy and/or filth. Give me just one chance to explain a theory of mine.

What if they are right? What if the galaxies are spinning madly into nothingness making the universe exponentially larger with ever tick of our earthbound clocks? What are the ramifications for Creationism if they are right?

Well, here is my one chance (thanks for your patience). Look at two of the theory's precepts:
1) The Universe is constantly expanding - Creation was so incredible that it is still happening daily - stars are born and die, forming new creation such as quasars, supernovas and neutron stars. and the actual space the Universe contains is growing ever larger.
2) The Universe is making a "sound" that can be "heard" on an antenna.

Is it more incredible that God created everything in seven days or that He unleashed a force so colossal that it is still happening even as you are processing my words? How miraculous that the echo of the second that followed the words "Let there be light" can still be heard by scientists today all these years later? I am awestruck to imagine that God is so incredible that He can say "Let there be..." and ages later those things are still coming into being and ages from now you'll be able to detect the echo of their inception over a man-made instrument.

So, I ask you, before you dismiss the science of the theory, please consider its merits in light of the power of a sovereign Almighty God and then with a long gaze out into the cosmos revealed by a clear night sky, ask yourself "How big is my God?"

Thursday, February 12, 2009

A Night at the Theatre and the Right to Think

(This article originally appeared on One Flew Over the Church - Thu, 02/12/2009)

My wife and I both enjoy the theatre. Last weekend we attended a local performance of "Inherit the Wind". The play is based on the real-life drama surrounding the Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee in July of 1925. A science teacher was placed on trial for the crime of teaching the information found in Charles Darwin's "Origin of Species". Dayton, a small town in the rural South, was almost consumed by the religious beliefs of the local church and while that sounds like a good thing, it is often dangerous for any system of thought (or lack thereof) to reign unopposed.

A friend of ours was there as well. I hold her opinion with respect because I know her heart and her faith. She told us that the play lit a fire in her to study the history of the actual story. She commented that the play cast the Christians in such a negative light but she really believed that it probably wasn't far from the truth. That isn't an exact quote but it was the sentiment - one that we both shared with her. We all know that there is probably some exaggeration or sensationalizing of the actions of the people of Dayton but let's face it, probably not very much. The zeal of the people blinded them to the injustice they were forcing on someone and they were incapable of seeing that they were nailing someone else to one of Christianity's worst fears - being persecuted for what they believe. The preacher praying for judgment and wrath to fall upon the malefactor and a curse upon any one who offered or wished him grace. We all do that sometimes. God bless and forgive us, we do that. And if we should really fear what may happen to us do we really need to give our detractors any ideas on ways to silence and persecute us? Maybe we should remember the Golden Rule ourselves.

The comment is made in the play that "the right to think" is actually what is on trial. Considering that what Scopes was doing was offering the tails side of the coin to people that had no shortage of knowledge of the heads side, I have to say that that assessment is accurate.The right to think for yourself is dependent on your commitment to understanding more than one point of view on the topic at hand. You don't have to burn a book to destroy it, it only has to go unread.

Which leads me to the question of this article. It is a question that I have asked in other articles but it still goes unanswered. What are we so afraid of? My wife and I are both Christians. Our friend I mentioned earlier is a Christian. Many of the cast members of this play are Christians. And the best we can tell, none of them are abandoning their faith over the considerations of the theory of evolution.

If we believe that the process of discipleship leads us into the Mind of Christ, why do we so fear using the mind that He gives us? Why does the Bible tell us that His people are destroyed from lack of knowledge? What is the use in a renewed mind that collects dust? Is our faith so weak and unreliable that it cannot coexist with a seventh grade science book?

My kids believe that God created the world and everything in it. They know that He created the entire Universe. I don't fear million year old rocks at a science museum. I am not afraid of light from distant stars that takes millions of years to get here. I have addressed this topic in a previous article ("Bang!") and I am still of the firm belief that we are trying to oversimplify the creation story.

Let me elaborate a little. There are undeniable adaptations and changes in humans and other animals as well as plants and fungi. Environmental adaptations, breeding techniques, improved nutrition, genetic mutations - they all happen. None of them destroy your faith - not if your faith is real. Through the strength of your faith, you can have the right to think - to ponder difficult questions and decide for yourself, to hear about theories and weigh them in your own way, to listen to scientific evidence without fear and arrive at your own conclusion.

Darwin's theory is exactly that - a theory. It has segments as solid as Georgia granite. It has segments as unstable and unreliable as quicksand. It is what it is and we should consider it as such.

I came away from that night with the joy of a night at the theatre with the love of my life. I also received the gift of some excellent conversation with her about the topic at hand. As a special bonus, I got the reminder of my right to think and the freedom from fear to exercise that right.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Kingdom

(This article originally appeared on One Flew Over the Church)

"The Kingdom of God is like unto a church sanctuary, filled with the souls of all the people who came forward to the altar during the invitation and recited the 'sinner's prayer' with the assistance of an altar counselor. They are all gathered together in one big church service forever and ever, singing and glorifying God".

Notice that there is no Scriptural citation with that verse. It seems that this can be found nowhere in Scripture and yet you can hear this description of Heaven in churches throughout the United States every Sunday morning. Try sharing that description of Heaven with a person on the street and see if they are ready to sign up for your brand of Christianity. I would hurl a resounding "NO" in your direction before brushing you off.

And what is it about our understanding of "Heaven"? Ask your average Christian and you might get an answer like "The place where God lives". So I have to ask, where exactly does an omnipresent God live? Jesus offered an answer of sorts to Pilate: “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.”.

Jesus wanted Pilate to know that His Kingdom was unlike any kingdom that he had ever seen. It was a completely new concept. Jesus and John the Baptizer had already heralded this new Kingdom about three years earlier and informed the people that would (or could) listen that it was "at hand". If this Kingdom was present. yet different than any other, maybe we have misunderstood the Kingdom entirely.

When Jesus taught his disciples to pray, He shared with them a template, constructed in the form of Old Testament style poetry where one line is modified by the next line. He taught them to pray "Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven". It seems as if He was telling us that His Kingdom comes any time His will is done on this Earth. And if part of His will is to redeem us and reconcile us with Himself, then that is a manifestation of the Kingdom.

With that in mind, look at what Peter had to say about the people of God - the "citizens of the Kingdom", if you will:

I Peter 2:4 Coming to Him as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen by God and precious, 5 you also, as living stones, are being built up a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. 6 Therefore it is also contained in the Scripture,
“ Behold, I lay in Zion
A chief cornerstone, elect, precious,
And he who believes on Him will by no means be put to shame.”

7 Therefore, to you who believe, He is precious; but to those who are disobedient,
“ The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone,”

8 and
“ A stone of stumbling
And a rock of offense.”

They stumble, being disobedient to the word, to which they also were appointed.
9 But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 who once were not a people but are now the people of God, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy.


As Jesus said in Luke 17: "20 Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, “The kingdom of God does not come with observation; 21 nor will they say, ‘See here!’ or ‘See there!’ For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you.” So each and every one of us is a block that is used to construct the home of God, the Kingdom. We are the Kingdom, not made of physical brick and mortar but of something a little more real than that. We once were not a people. We were murderers, homosexuals, adulterers, worshipers of idols. We were drunkards, thieves, liars. We were everything that is wrong with this fallen world. The only difference now is the grace provided by Jesus Christ that has made us "the righteousness of God".

And still the natural eye still shows no evidence that we are "a people". We are African, European, Asian, Australian and from the Americas. We are unbelievably rich and helplessly poor. We are tall, short, thin and fat.

And were are everything in between.

Jesus explained to Nicodemus that you have to look past the natural: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but cannot tell where it comes from and where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.” We make up the Kingdom and we are like the wind - therefore, so is the Kingdom. You can't see the wind - the trees rustle and objects move but no one can see what is causing it all. So it is with the Kingdom - the sick are healed, the hungry are fed, the low are uplifted, the widows and orphans are cared for, the lost are reconciled but it is not immediately apparent why. You can see the effects, but not the cause.

And just as the rock, cut out without hands, in Nebuchadnezzar's dream, the Kingdom started small - one man and his insignificant band of ruffians - and has grown. Although there is still much darkness and much world to do, this Kingdom is slowly, but surely, consuming the Earth. Not with armies with weapons and flags but with truth, peace and love. The Kingdom began on the hillsides of Judea and has spread to every corner of the Earth. We can be found in Times Square, Trafalgar Square, Red Square and Tienamen Square. This Kingdom will contiune to grow and flourish, unseen and yet coexisting with the kingdoms of men until the stone becomes "a great mountain and fills the whole earth".

The Kingdom is at hand. It isn't the natural revolt against the government that the Zealots wished for. It isn't the culture war victory the Pharisees wished for. We can't go hide in some secluded compound like the Essenes. We have to do His will on Earth as it is in Heaven. We have to seek the Kingdom first and let the rest of the chips fall where they may. We have to stop looking forward to Jesus establishing His Kingdom and notice the wind blowing all around us.