Another local story. This one with a strong connection to current politics.
Football has a storied tradition in the South and Georgia is no exception. This particular story goes back to the days when football was young, back before Southern towns doubled their population on Saturdays in the fall.
On October 30, 1897 the University of Georgia, before they were known as the Bulldogs, played the University of Virginia. Sometime during the game, a young man from Rome named Von Gammon was carrying the ball when he was reportedly tackled "by the entire Virginia team." This, of course, is understandable as it would take 11Virginians to tackle a Georgia boy. But but that's beside the point.
When the pile unfolded, Von Gammon remained motionless on the ground. Doctors at the game determined he had a serious head injury. He was carried to Grady Hospital where he died early the next morning. He would be buried in Myrtle Hill Cemetery a literal stone's throw from the well travelled naval officer from the last entry.
The legislature was in session at that time and as the news spread across the state the government did what it does best. It initiated a knee jerk overreaction and passed a bill that would ban the sport of football in Georgia. It was said to be too dangerous. No football. No "Between the Hedges". No "Ramblin' Wreck". No tailgating. Nothing.
But football had an unlikely ally.
Rosalind Burns Gammon, Von's mother, wrote the local representative to the legislature. (I'm hesitant to call him "her legislator" as in 1897 she couldn't legally register to vote.) She lobbied for the sport her son and his friends loved. She didn't want Von's death to be the reason his friends were barred from playing. She begged them to stop the bill. The letter found its way to the governor - the last step the bill needed to become law. Part of Mrs. Gammon's argument was that Von had two friends die, one rock climbing and one skating, and their sports had not been banned from the state.
In the end, the governor vetoed the bill. Georgia Football was saved. It was all because a mom stood up, refused to be a victim and kept the government's meddling out of football.
115+ years have passed since that sad Saturday. Football has changed greatly. But two things remained the same. It still takes 11 Virginians to tackle one Georgian, and the government still can't mind its own business.
President Barack Obama recently opined about the safety of football, the likelihood he would have let his theoretical son play football and the changes that need to be made to deal with "the violence" in football.
Football without violence is like chocolate cake without the chocolate and broccoli substituted for the cake. Football without the violence is like...well...frankly it's like baseball. How dreadful.
But now that I think about it if you count those catcher/runner collisions, hit batters, Robin Ventura's ill-advised mound charges and the Braves tripping over each other in the post-season, baseball is rather violent.
Think of every sport you have heard an instance about someone getting a concussion. That leaves us with what?
If you're keeping score at home, that leaves us with nothing. Not even golf.
So what does Mr. Obama propose little boys do with their spare time? What would his theoretical son be allowed to play?
I'm hoping that somewhere along the way Mr. Obama runs across a old letter from a Mrs. Gammon and he learns what football is really all about. I'm hoping he stays far away from the gridiron and allows self-governance and personal responsibility govern football. Mrs Gammon understood that it wasn't the role of government to protect us from football. Hopefully, Mr Obama will concur.
Multimedia perspectives on history, culture, food, architecture, and tradition. The love of all things Southern and Southern critiques of everything else. Find us on Twitter @BiscuitsGA & Instagram allthebiscuitsingeorgia
Monday, January 28, 2013
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Heard a story this week.My eldest son and I had the pleasure of attending a symposium on local heroes from the War Between the States downtown at the local library.
One of the stories was especially touching. Pictured with this entry is the headstone of Bayard Hand. Yes, he died in 1859, two years before the war but this US sailor had a role in the biggest conflict in American History up to that time.
In 1864 William Sherman and his army paid a visit to Rome. After a time of planning and organizing torches lit the fire of the first of many towns burned in the "March to the Sea". As the US Army left with the flames reaching for the sky, their knapsacks clinked with the pilfered jewelry, silverware and other valuables they decided to help themselves to. But material goods were not all the Yankees stole. They also stole the body of Lt. Bayard Hand
Apparently, after seeing the US Naval emblem on the tombstone, the Federal soldiers decided that such a man should not be buried in Rome, Georgia. So, in spite of his family's protests, they exhumed his body and sent it to Arlington, Virginia to be buried at the new cemetery established on the estate that the same US Army stole from the wife of General Robert E. Lee.
This family, without doubt, lost material possessions to the invading army. Perhaps they lost their home and certainly their hometown to Sherman's torches. But the thought of the Union Army marching away with their disinterred son and then to hear of his burial at Arlington. It's hard for me to imagine.
But a father's love runs deep.
Bayard's step-father travelled to Virginia in 1866. At a personal cost of $300 (a large sum in that day) he had his son re-exhumed and transported back to Rome. Bayard Hand was then reinterred in his own grave.
Sitting there with my son it was hard to imagine what that dad went through, what he dealt with or the ease with which I can only guess he parted with a large sum of money to right such a wrong and get his son back, even 6 years after Bayard's death.
Being a dad, I understand.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The Most Wonderful Time of the Year
Happy Holidays!
There. I said it. That horrible, terrible, most anti-Christian display of syncretism known to man.
The horror.
Before the the fire is lit under the tar kettle or the knives are put to pillows to produce the wispy goose down for my Yuletide adornment please allow me to explain myself.
In America a few things can be counted on in consideration of the year's closing act. 1) Retail stores will continue to steadily ease the appearance of Christmas decor and music ever closer to the Fourth of July and people will continue to be offended by the phraseology used to wish goodwill during the weeks surrounding the Winter Solstice.
Almost makes one want to switch to "Go fart fire" or maybe "Have a terrible winter". Something like that.
Anyway.
The funny thing is, the person most likely to correct you towards "Merry Christmas" is proportionately just as likely to express "support for Israel", whatever that means.
Which makes me think...either you love Israel or you don't. You can't have it both ways.
Now, while most of the Jewish people I have met appear to harbor no obvious animosity to wreaths, candy canes, Jolly ol' St Nick, O Tannenbaum or even live reenactments of shepherds watching their flocks by night breaking away from the task to welcome the birth of Christ, I think it is ignorant on the part of us, as Christians, to expect them to "Have a Merry Christmas or get on a boat and go back where you came from".
Seriously. They're Jewish. We love Jewish people, right? You know, Jewish people, King David, Elijah, Solomon, Jesus, John, Peter, Paul and a bunch of ladies named Mary. Jewish people.
A pleasant "Happy Holidays" gives a polite inclusion to a group of people that were being persecuted before Jesus celebrated His first Hanukkah. It also includes the Federally-recognized holiday "New Year's Day" as well as "Thanksgiving", which apparently has something to do with pro football, elastic waistbands and Christmas, although there are those that refer to people known as "pilgrims" that founded Macy's or something like that. I'll have to research those claims for an entry next November. Maybe by then I'll have the tar and feathers removed.
Until then, I hope whatever holiday you prefer is as glorious, magnificent, merry and happy as it can possibly be. And SMILE, this is the most wonderful time of the year.
There. I said it. That horrible, terrible, most anti-Christian display of syncretism known to man.
The horror.
Before the the fire is lit under the tar kettle or the knives are put to pillows to produce the wispy goose down for my Yuletide adornment please allow me to explain myself.
In America a few things can be counted on in consideration of the year's closing act. 1) Retail stores will continue to steadily ease the appearance of Christmas decor and music ever closer to the Fourth of July and people will continue to be offended by the phraseology used to wish goodwill during the weeks surrounding the Winter Solstice.
Almost makes one want to switch to "Go fart fire" or maybe "Have a terrible winter". Something like that.
Anyway.
The funny thing is, the person most likely to correct you towards "Merry Christmas" is proportionately just as likely to express "support for Israel", whatever that means.
Which makes me think...either you love Israel or you don't. You can't have it both ways.
Now, while most of the Jewish people I have met appear to harbor no obvious animosity to wreaths, candy canes, Jolly ol' St Nick, O Tannenbaum or even live reenactments of shepherds watching their flocks by night breaking away from the task to welcome the birth of Christ, I think it is ignorant on the part of us, as Christians, to expect them to "Have a Merry Christmas or get on a boat and go back where you came from".
Seriously. They're Jewish. We love Jewish people, right? You know, Jewish people, King David, Elijah, Solomon, Jesus, John, Peter, Paul and a bunch of ladies named Mary. Jewish people.
A pleasant "Happy Holidays" gives a polite inclusion to a group of people that were being persecuted before Jesus celebrated His first Hanukkah. It also includes the Federally-recognized holiday "New Year's Day" as well as "Thanksgiving", which apparently has something to do with pro football, elastic waistbands and Christmas, although there are those that refer to people known as "pilgrims" that founded Macy's or something like that. I'll have to research those claims for an entry next November. Maybe by then I'll have the tar and feathers removed.
Until then, I hope whatever holiday you prefer is as glorious, magnificent, merry and happy as it can possibly be. And SMILE, this is the most wonderful time of the year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
